Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer
    Insight Article
    Home > Articles > Article
    Pamela Ballou-Nelson
    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, CMPE

    Introduction

    Medicare and Medicaid fraud, waste and abuse affect every American by draining critical resources from our healthcare system, and contribute to the rising cost of healthcare for all. Taxpayer dollars lost to fraud, waste and abuse harm multiple parties, particularly some of our most vulnerable citizens. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency that administers Medicare, estimates that in 2015 some $60 billion of American taxpayer money, or more than 10 percent of Medicare’s total budget, was lost to fraud, waste, abuse and improper payments (by Avila, Marshall & Kaul 2015).

    Looking at total healthcare spending, the Institute of Medicine (now known as the Health and Medicine Division) reported in 2012:

    Source: Transformation of Health System Needed to Improve Care and Reduce Costs, Institute of Medicine, Sept. 6, 2012.

    Fraud, waste and abuse defined

    Medicare defines fraud, waste and abuse (FWA) as:

    Examples of fraud include*:

    • Knowingly submitting, or causing to be submitted, false claims or making misrepresentations of fact to obtain a federal healthcare payment for which no entitlement would otherwise exist
    • Knowingly soliciting, receiving, offering and/or paying remuneration to induce or reward referrals for items or services reimbursed by federal healthcare programs

    Examples of abuse include*:

    • Billing for unnecessary medical services
    • Charging excessively for services or supplies
    • Misusing codes on a claim, such as upcoding or unbundling codes

    *Source: Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, ICN 006827 Oct. 2016

    Coding is a major target for FWA exposure. CMS is targeting all causes of improper payments, from honest mistakes to intentional deception. The most common errors in coding are insufficient documentation.

    How FWA is detected

    Look for patterns of behavior:

    • Service volume
    • Excessive testing
    • False claims
    • Unbundling
    • Upcoding
    • Excessive services
    • Expensive procedures and services
    • Quality of care concerns

    A practice with a well-composed compliance program can:

    • Increase the potential of proper submission and payment of claims
    • Reduce billing mistakes
    • Improve the results of reviews conducted by Medicare and Medicaid claims
    • Avoid the potential for fraud, waste and abuse
    • Promote patient safety and ensure delivery of high quality patient care

    The following steps are important for a well-developed compliance plan for your practice:

    • Follow the OIG’s Guide for Physician Groups and look into free resources from OIG, CMS and the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Team (HEAT)
    • Create simple to read policies and procedures in your compliance plans
    • Review your compliance plan every year
    • Engage your providers and staff to “buy into” the compliance program
    • Ensure that your compliance plan is “real”
    • Check to ensure that all compliance plans spell out the consequences of not following the rules

    Resources


    Note: Humana (as well as other commercial plans) has adopted training content published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that addresses fraud, waste and abuse. Contracted healthcare providers and business partners supporting Humana’s Medicare and/or Medicaid products must use CMS content to train their employees and the entities supporting them to meet certain contractual obligations to Humana.

    MGMA Consulting offers assistance with compliance policy development and assessment of your practice’s compliance program. Contact Pam at pballounelson@mgma.com for more information.

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson

    Written By

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, CMPE

    Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, PhD, has more than 30 years of experience in healthcare management, focusing on practice process transformation, patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), workflow analysis, quality measures, care management, population health and patient activation across the continuum of care. Nelson has worked with both provider and payer organizations to help them work toward alternative care and payment models. As clinical quality director for Adventist Health Network in Chicago, Nelson was responsible for leading physicians and hospital directors in their clinical integration process. Nelson has also worked with numerous commercial payers on quality outcomes and effectiveness measures, including compliance with Medicaid care management programs, along with Medicaid insurance contracts and high-risk and dual-eligible patient programs. She has also trained, advised and mentored more than 80 practices in various levels of readiness, preparing them for value-based payment reform, process improvement, improved quality outcomes and increased efficiency through PCMH recognition with 2011 and 2014 standards. She has a BSN from the University of Utah, an MA from Wheaton College, and an MS and PhD in Public Health from Walden University. In addition, she is an NCQA 2014 PCMH certified content expert and frequently speaks on PCMH transformation for accountable care organizations and population health initiatives.


    Explore Related Content

    More Insight Articles

    Explore Related Topics

    Ask MGMA
    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙