Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer

    The MGMA membership renewal portal is experiencing intermittent issues. We are working on a fix. If you're unable to renew, please call 877.275.6462 ext. 1888 or email service@mgma.com to renew.

    Advocacy Letter
    Home > Press Statements & Advocacy Letters > Advocacy Letters

    February 22, 2018   
     
    Ms. Seema Verma
    Administrator  
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services  
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services  
    Hubert H. Humphrey Building  
    200 Independence Avenue, S.W.  
    Washington, DC 20201  
     
    Re: Request for a third agreement period for certain ACOs in Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Track 1  
     
    Dear Administrator Verma: 
     
    The undersigned organizations write to request that CMS modify regulations at §425.600(b) to allow certain ACOs to continue in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Track 1 for a third agreement period before having to move to a two-sided model. Our recommendations reflect our unified expectation and desire to see the MSSP achieve the long-term sustainability necessary to enhance care coordination for Medicare beneficiaries, lower the growth rate of healthcare spending and improve quality in the Medicare program. Specifically, our key goals for the MSSP include encouraging increased participation, enabling ACOs to continue in the program and creating a successful, long-term ACO model for Medicare. It is in Medicare’s interest for ACOs to continue in order to provide high quality care for beneficiaries and to reduce the growth rate of Medicare spending. 
     
    MSSP Track 1 remains by far the most popular option for ACOs, representing 82 percent of MSSP ACOs in 2018. However, ACOs may only remain in Track 1 for two agreement periods before being required to move to a two-sided risk model or drop out of the program. Many ACOs remain in Track 1 because they are unprepared to assume risk requiring them to potentially pay millions of dollars to Medicare, which is simply not practical or feasible for most of these organizations. Providers in rural areas and safety-net providers, which care for some of the most vulnerable patient populations, often face even greater challenges than other providers when considering taking on risk. However, the challenge of being forced into risk is of great importance to ACOs of all sizes, composition and ownership. The financial position and backing of a particular ACO as well as the ability to assume risk depends on a variety of factors, such as local market dynamics, culture, leadership, financial status, and the resources required to address social determinants of health that influence care and outcomes for patients with complex needs.  
     
     

    View the full letter


    Explore Related Content

    More Advocacy Letters

    Ask MGMA
    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙